Circumstantial Evidence?

How strong does circumstantial evidence have to be to become a fact?, or to lead to a conviction or confession, or a change in behavior? Take, for instance, the Origin of COVID-19 (the Wuhan Virus), it was first reported very near the Wuhan Institute, where virus mutation was being experimented with, and it comes to light that the NIH (National Institute of Health) of the U. S. was also involved. (the agency Dr. Anthony Fauci was connected to) The other questions that come up on the Wuhan Virus deal is how come the Chinese knew they had to take immediate radical measures to contain it, and the bat story?, did anyone hear about a ‘panic’ operation to eradicate bats, in China? Another example of ‘circumstantial’ evidence, O.J. Simpson is still searching for whoever killed Ron and Nicole. And then we get to Alzheimer’s and beer in aluminum cans. The reports of aluminum in the brains of Alzheimer’s victims came out years ago, is there a connection, or not? While the investigation of where the Wuhan originated still ‘simmers’ on, and Television can still sell tickets to ‘The Murder of Ron and Nicole’, the deal with Alzheimer’s and beer in aluminum cans seems to have died on the vine. Like universal health care, it was a great idea, but somehow it got sidetracked. The little progress made with universal health care (Medicare), has been ‘gut shot’ by the politicians and the Med and Drug Industry. The adage ‘follow the money’, probably would explain everything.

#405 www.byrdsword.com

August 14, 2021